Opinion
Video
Author(s):
An expert discusses the preference for narrow-spectrum oral antibiotics in acne treatment due to their favorable safety profile, emphasizing a short-term, combination approach aligned with stewardship principles and the need to balance clinical effectiveness, patient preferences, and access challenges.
My preferred oral antibiotic for treating acne is a narrow-spectrum option because it offers a significant safety advantage over broader-spectrum antibiotics such as doxycycline and minocycline. When selecting treatments, I consider the balance between how effective a medication is and how safe it is for the patient. This helps me choose therapies that provide the best results with the least risk. Narrow-spectrum antibiotics tend to cause fewer adverse effects such as gut upset, photosensitivity, and dizziness, which are more common with other oral tetracyclines. Because of this, they often serve as the first choice when prescribing oral antibiotics for acne.
A key part of managing acne with oral antibiotics is setting clear expectations for treatment duration. Typically, a course lasts 3 to 6 months with the goal of quickly controlling inflammation while combining oral therapy with topical treatments for long-term maintenance. After this initial period, the goal is to stop the oral antibiotic and maintain improvements with topical agents alone. This strategy helps reduce potential risks associated with prolonged antibiotic use. However, some patients may hesitate to stop once they see improvements, especially if they have important social events coming up. In those cases, a flexible, patient-centered approach is important, balancing safety data with individual needs.
Antibiotic stewardship is an ongoing challenge in acne treatment. Although resistance from oral antibiotics is less commonly seen in everyday practice, it remains a concern, especially with topical antibiotic monotherapy, which has led to high resistance rates in acne bacteria historically. Using narrow-spectrum antibiotics aligns better with stewardship principles by reducing the risk of resistance and minimizing harm to the gut microbiome. However, access to these safer narrow-spectrum options can be limited due to insurance coverage and cost, highlighting the need for broader availability and more research to develop similar targeted therapies.
Like what you’re reading? Subscribe to Dermatology Times for weekly updates on therapies, innovations, and real-world practice tips.