News
Article
This content is sponsored by Amgen and was developed in conjunction with Linda Stein Gold, MD, April Armstrong, MD, both of whom were compensated by Amgen for their participation.
The landscape of plaque psoriasis treatment is evolving, particularly in how physicians think about disease severity, treatment goals and the timing of systemic therapy use or initiation.1 Recent guidance has redefined how we classify psoriasis severity, recognizing that even patients with limited skin involvement may experience substantial disease burden and could benefit from systemic therapy.1-3 Emerging research continues to enhance our understanding of treatment approaches for these patients and may help inform optimal management strategies.2
A recent large-scale, real-world evidence study has provided important insights into the impact of timing of initiating a systemic therapy in plaque psoriasis treatment.2 To explore these findings, we spoke with two leading experts in the field: Dr. Linda Stein Gold, Division Head of Dermatology at Henry Ford Health System and former vice president of the American Academy of Dermatology, and Dr. April Armstrong, Chief of Dermatology at University of California, Los Angeles. Both doctors were investigators on the real-world study discussed below.
Indication
Otezla® (apremilast) is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with plaque psoriasis who are candidates for phototherapy or systemic therapy.
Important Safety Information
Contraindications
Otezla® (apremilast) is contraindicated in patients with a known hypersensitivity to apremilast or to any of the excipients in the formulation.
Please see additional Important Safety Information further below.
Otezla Clinical Evidence: The ADVANCE Trial
Before examining the real-world evidence, it's important to understand the foundational clinical data that preceded it. The pivotal Phase 3 ADVANCE trial was a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study evaluated Otezla® (apremilast) in 595 adult patients with mild to moderate plaque psoriasis.4
The study population had a mean baseline body surface area (BSA) of 6.4%, with inclusion criteria requiring BSA involvement of 2%-15%, a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score of 2-15, and a static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA) score of 2-3. These were patients who had been inadequately controlled with or intolerant to topical therapy and were allowed unmedicated emollients for body lesions and nonmedicated shampoos for scalp.4 Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either Otezla 30 mg twice daily (n=297) or placebo (n=298) for the first 16 weeks, followed by an open-label extension phase through week 32.5
The trial met its primary endpoint, with 21.6% (n=297) of patients receiving Otezla achieving an sPGA* response at week 16 compared to 4.1% (n=298) with placebo (p<0.0001). The study also demonstrated statistically significant improvements in key secondary endpoints at week 16, including Whole Body Itch Numeric Rating Scale response† (43.2% versus 18.6%) and Scalp Physician's Global Assessment response‡ (44% versus 16.6%) compared to placebo. The safety profile remained consistent with the safety profile in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, with the most commonly reported treatment-emergent adverse events (≥5%) being diarrhea, headache, nausea, nasopharyngitis, and upper respiratory tract infection.4-5
"The ADVANCE trial addressed a critical gap in our understanding," explains Dr. Stein Gold, who was also an investigator on this trial. "The five-fold improvement in response rates demonstrated the potential for systemic therapy in this patient population, with 21.6% of patients taking Otezla achieving an sPGA response at week 16, compared to just 4.1% with placebo."
While ADVANCE demonstrated how Otezla can help patients with mild to moderate plaque psoriasis, an important question remained: what impact could the timing of initiating Otezla have on patients? A subsequent real-world study helped shed light on this critical question.2
Real-World Evidence: Examining Timing of Initiating Otezla
A recent real-world study has provided insight into the impact of the timing of initiating Otezla in patients with mild to moderate plaque psoriasis. "Real-world data really complement the clinical trial data," explains Dr. Armstrong. "In clinical trials, you often have a very curated population of patients. Whereas in the real world, in our clinical practice, dermatologists have a heterogeneous population of patients that we manage and treat every day. Therefore, real world data that reflect the realities of our daily practice can help inform certain treatment decisions.
The retrospective, observational analysis examined electronic medical record and claims data from the OM1 database, including over 13,000 U.S. adults with mild to moderate plaque psoriasis. The study focused on patients whose first available BSA value after diagnosis was between ≥1% to ≤10% -- designated as the index date. These patients were new to systemic treatment, had no prior psoriatic arthritis diagnosis, had at least a year of baseline data, and either initiated Otezla or started a second topical prescription between 2014 and 2023.3 Note: Patients on topicals could either have switched or added a new topical. Notably, patients had a mean BSA of 5.5% at baseline, and in the Otezla arm, about 50.5% used concomitant topical therapy during the study.2,6
A total of 3,589 patients had started Otezla, with 2,073 starting Otezla within 6 months of their index date and 1,516 starting at least 6 months after their index date. Early initiators had a median time to Otezla start of just 2 weeks after their index date, while late initiators didn't initiate treatment until a median of 16 months after their index date.2
The studies showed that the early initiator group (n=2,073) experienced a 2% BSA increase from index date to Otezla start (≤6 months; median 2 weeks). In the late initiator group (n=1,516) there was a 49% BSA increase from index date to Otezla start (>6 months; median 16 months).
The study also demonstrated that in the group that initiated Otezla early, 6.0% mean BSA at index date slightly increased to 6.1% mean BSA at Otezla initiation. In the late initiation group, however, 4.9% mean BSA at index date increased to 7.3% mean BSA at Otezla initiation.
The study also revealed important insights about treatment history. "What's particularly noteworthy," Dr. Stein Gold points out, "is that before starting Otezla, 54% of early initiators and 75% of late initiators had tried three or more topicals. This highlights the varying treatment journeys patients may experience before initiating systemic therapy.”
"These findings underscore the timing of systemic therapy," notes Dr. Stein Gold. "Patients who were late Otezla initiators (n=1,516) saw an average of 49% increase in BSA from index date."
Of note, this real-world study had several important limitations to consider. While prescription data was available, actual medication adherence couldn't be confirmed. Additionally, while the study was anchored on the first observed BSA value, this may not have been the patient's first BSA measurement, and disease duration before the index date was unknown. For the topical group, it wasn't possible to distinguish between treatment switching and adding a new topical to an existing regimen.6
It's also worth noting that patients with disease severity measures (BSA values) may be different from patients that don't have these measures, though a database comparison suggested no major differences in patient characteristics between these groups. Finally, since this is real-world evidence and not a clinical trial, conclusions about statistical or clinical significance cannot be drawn.6
Looking Forward: Evolving Approaches to Treating Plaque Psoriasis
The treatment landscape for limited plaque psoriasis continues to evolve, informed by both clinical trials and real-world evidence. The ADVANCE trial demonstrated the efficacy and safety of Otezla in mild-to-moderate disease, while real-world evidence has now highlighted the impact of the timing of initiating Otezla.2,4,7 Moving forward, a key opportunity lies in better identifying which patients with limited disease might benefit from systemic therapy before cycling through multiple topicals.
IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION CON'T
Warnings and Precautions
Adverse Reactions
Use in Specific Populations
Please click here for the full Prescribing Information.
INDICATIONS
Otezla® is indicated for the treatment of:
++
*sPGA response was defined as the percentage of patients who achieved sPGA score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) and ≥2-point reduction from baseline.
†Patients achieving a ≥4-point reduction in WBI-NRS from baseline
‡In patients with ScPGA ≥2 at baseline. ScPGA score of clear [0] or almost clear [1] with at least a 2-point reduction from baseline.
References:
Like what you’re reading? Subscribe to Dermatology Times for weekly updates on therapies, innovations, and real-world practice tips.