News
Article
Author(s):
This review of the latest dermatologic studies includes insights into epidermolysis bullosa for primary care providers, patient-reported impact of atopic dermatitis on pediatric and adolescent patients, and more.
A recent review emphasized the role of pediatricians and primary care providers in managing patients with epidermolysis bullosa (EB). As patients often attend multidisciplinary clinics intermittently, primary care providers frequently serve as the first point of contact for acute and routine care. The review highlights available resources, practical care tips, and newly approved therapies to support collaboration between pediatricians, dermatologists, and specialists in optimizing outcomes for children with EB.1
A recent cross-sectional survey assessed the real-world disease burden and treatment patterns in pediatric and adolescent patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis. Data from 772 patients across Europe and the US were analyzed (393 pediatric [0–11 years], 379 adolescent [12–17 years]). Adolescents were more likely than pediatric patients to be treated with systemic corticosteroids, phototherapy, immunosuppressants, or biologics (p < 0.0001). Itch was highly bothersome in both groups, with 38% citing it as the most troubling symptom. Adolescents reported greater anxiety-related bother (67% vs. 49%), self-consciousness (p < 0.0001), and impacts on friendships (p < 0.05).2
A recent multicenter retrospective cohort study evaluated real-world outcomes of biologic therapies in patients with bullous pemphigoid (BP). Among 2435 screened records across 15 Italian hospitals, 58 Caucasian patients met inclusion criteria—39 received dupilumab and 19 omalizumab. Disease control was achieved in 90.6% of dupilumab-treated patients and 77.8% of those on omalizumab. Complete remission on minimal therapy was seen in 71.0% and 64.7% of patients, respectively. Both groups showed a significant decrease in disease severity over time (p < 0.05). Findings support the potential role of biologics—particularly dupilumab—as adjuvant therapies in difficult-to-treat BP.3
A recent imaging-based study investigated correlations between skin photoaging phenotypes—atrophic (AP), hypertrophic (HP), and controls—using optical coherence tomography, dynamic-OCT (D-OCT), standardized clinical photography, and reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM). Researchers analyzed 58 patients (AP: 17; HP: 24; controls: 17) to determine imaging differences among phenotypes. AP subjects demonstrated significantly higher vessel assets and densities via D-OCT (p < 0.05) compared to HP and controls. RCM collagen scores correlated with clinically observed wrinkles, especially in HP subjects. Findings support the need to tailor treatment approaches based on skin photoaging morphology to optimize personalized care.4
A recent discrete choice experiment explored patient preferences regarding teledermatology for psoriasis in Germany, where adoption remains low despite supportive guidelines. Researchers surveyed 221 patients (mean age: 58.9 years; 39.8% female) and analyzed responses using conditional logit models. While patients generally preferred standard-of-care, key factors such as care from a known physician, the ability to ask questions, acknowledgment of concerns, and quick responses—especially during flare-ups—significantly increased the appeal of teledermatology. The study found no preference between live-interactive and store-and-forward modes. Findings suggest that aligning teledermatology services with patient priorities may improve its adoption in psoriasis care.5
References
What new studies have you been involved with or authored? Share with us by emailing DTEditor@mmhgroup.com for an opportunity to be featured.
Like what you’re reading? Subscribe to Dermatology Times for weekly updates on therapies, innovations, and real-world practice tips.