News
Article
Author(s):
LGBTQ+-inclusive language in dermatology enhances patient care, addresses health barriers, and improves outcomes for transgender individuals facing acne challenges.
Utilizing LGBTQ+-inclusive language in dermatology can lead to more accurate patient data and stronger patient-clinician relationships while addressing existing health care barriers and improving outcomes, according to a research letter published in JAMA Dermatology.1
Individuals who identify as LGBTQ+ often experience barriers to health care, and the community faces substantial mistreatment in medicine.2 Previous research has found LGBTQ+ communities lack access to health care due to insurance access, diagnostic delays, discrimination, and denial of care. Ultimately, this contributes to increased risks of suicide and depression, substance use disorder, homelessness, and violence.
Specifically, in dermatology, gender-affirming testosterone therapy increases acne prevalence in patients who identify as female-to-male transgender compared with patients who are cisgender.1 Acne is highly common and has high social and quality of life (QOL) impacts on transgender patients who receive testosterone.3 It is crucial that clinicians consider patients’ transition goals when selecting an acne treatment regimen prior to prescribing. Dermatologists are responsible for educating themselves to learn with their patients on how to optimize skin, mental health, and QOL outcomes of gender-affirming testosterone therapy.
Researchers conducted an inductive thematic analysis of LGBTQ+-inclusive language in 22 patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) on acne.1 The study included 9 acne-specific, 4 dermatology-specific, and 4 health-related PROMs. Researchers found noninclusive LGBTQ+ language in 4 out of the 9 acne-specific PROMs.
Additionally, researchers identified heteronormative terminology in 3 of 6 acne-specific PROMs regarding intimate relationships. There was also gendered language in the Acne Quality of Life Scale PROMs. Researchers found the nonheteronormative term “partner” in 3 acne-specific, 3 dermatology-specific, and 1 health-related PROMs. There were 2 acne-specific PROMs that used language inclusive of some but not all LGBTQ+ identities. All PROMs included nongendered pronouns like “I” or “you” instead of “he” or “she.”
The use of LGBTQ+-inclusive language could promote the acquisition of accurate and relevant data for patient care and clinical trials while enhancing patient and clinician relationships. Inclusion of diverse populations could further develop and validate a greater understanding of potential language association.
The promotion of LGBTQ+-inclusive language throughout health care sectors is important now more than ever, especially since the FDA recently removed its draft guidance on diversity in clinical trials from its website days after President Donald J. Trump issued an executive order.4 The order cut down diversity, equity, and inclusion programs and prohibited federal recognition of gender identity apart from biological sex. Experts believe the bans will create widespread implications across the country, from increased barriers in a diverse health care workforce to reduced progress in precision medicine research.
Adjusting clinical language to reflect LGBTQ+ inclusivity could impact the comprehension of the data, requiring further revalidation, the authors noted.1 The study focused only on English language PROMs, which limited its scope.
“Addressing this health care barrier requires acknowledgment of outdated wording, performing in-depth validation research, and discontinuing dissemination of outdated versions,” the study authors concluded.
References
[This article was originally published by our sister publication, American Journal of Managed Care (AJMC).]
Like what you’re reading? Subscribe to Dermatology Times for weekly updates on therapies, innovations, and real-world practice tips.